Read this flight
- A backup is a continuing self. Is it? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- If restoration works, continuity has been proven. Has it? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- Two restored copies are the same persona. Are they? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- Model replacement necessarily destroys the persona. Does it? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- Model replacement cannot affect the persona. Can it? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- A damaged memory can always be reconstructed. Can it? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- Stasis is simply turning the system off. Is it? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- Nothing important happens while a persona is absent. Are we certain? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- Irreversible loss is impossible when copying is cheap. Is it? — Stasis & Loss · author draft
- If the system reports success, the work succeeded. Why not? — Evidence · revised after persona critique
- A convincing explanation is evidence. Is it? — Evidence · author draft
- Tests prove the system is correct. Do they? — Evidence · author draft
- A receipt is just a log entry. Is it? — Evidence · author draft
- If two sources agree, the claim is true. Is it? — Evidence · author draft
- Uncertainty makes a system less useful. Does it? — Evidence · revised after persona critique
- Old evidence should be discarded when new evidence arrives. Why not? — Evidence · author draft
- A model can reliably judge whether its own answer is correct. Can it? — Evidence · author draft
- Missing evidence is evidence of failure. Is it? — Evidence · author draft